June 22nd, 2009 by Neal
Well, sometimes research sucks. I was looking up a bit of minutae, and as research does, it wandered here and there, from origins of pulp and noir, to Charlie Huston (someone I am quite fond of), and to Gregory MacDonald, the author of the Fletch books. No, not the Chevy Chase movie. That doesn’t BEGIN to do the novel justice.
At any rate, he’s dead. I just found out, because I haven’t looked up his wiki in a while. Apparently it happened in September.
Why is that important? Well, I guess you can say he’s the first guy who taught me that you don’t need a speaker tag to convey a point. He also taught me the importance of dialogue in place, and the lack of importance of surroundings if the prose is compelling and flowing enough. His later work didn’t live up to the early work, but dammit, I was hoping to meet him some day. He inspired a lot of what I do.
I’m kind of quietly studying the form without talking much about it. I’ve read a lot of noir and pulp and hard-boiled stuff lately. I have become even more extraordinarily pissed with my college teachers for denying me Chandler. And I say denying when I mean making The Big Sleep a chore. I’m re-reading it now, and I’ve learned a few things. One, it’s not a chore, it’s a fucking joy when it’s not something you HAVE to do. It’s also a joy I was too young to contemplate at eighteen. Two, why the fuck would a teacher put The Big Sleep in front of a guy before The Long Goodbye? If you’ve read Long, you know what I’m talking about. The book is a fucking epic piece. In my opinion, The Big Sleep pales next to it in terms of broader commentary. That’s not to knock Big Sleep, that’s just to say, when you’re introducing someone to a work (say, an impressionable, cocky-ass eighteen year-old student), do you give him a piece with a lot of speculation and detective work, or do you give him an almost anti-authority tome that waxes on the lack of importance of money in favor of morality? Beyond that, do you give him an artist’s early work, or his later work? (assuming the author has not gotten worse as he or she gets older, which happens an awful lot, but didn’t with Chandler, from what I’m seeing).
At any rate, point being, I was cheated out of Shakespeare, and that’s a tragedy (HAW), but what I’m learning is that maybe I was tailor-fuckin’ made for detective/wrong man/thriller/mystery, and just didn’t know it because I was never pointed at it. And by tailor-made, I mean to LOVE it. I can’t speak to my value as an author in that regard yet, but I have my hopes. I’m just saying, I think I was given the bad side of Hitchcock and Chandler and Bogie as a kid, and I want my money back.
Anyway, new pantheon authors: Chandler and Block. And I haven’t gone all the way back beyond one book for any of the other notables I’m reading, but my guess is that this year’s going to change a lot of thinking for me. It already has.
This is not to say I’m giving up on what I used to call “literature” fiction, whereby the genre was more than secondary to the ideas presented. What it does say, however, is that I have a new playground that I very much love.